Family line
Omega 2500
Parts cluster (Jules Borel sense)1 calibers0 lineage edges2 related edgesdesign:omega-2500
This profile traverses no edge types and drops disputed edges. Every edge in this view carries at least one reference.
Same caliber, other senses of “family”Everything (debug) · 25 calibersHeritage · 20 calibersHeritage · 12 calibersManufacturer-internal (Ranfft sense) · 1 calibersBased-on star (WatchBase sense) · 17 calibersBased-on star (WatchBase sense) · 9 calibers
Edge types in this family
accepteddisputedcontested region
Generations run left to right, ancestors first, and the axis along the top is ordinal rather than linear: each band is one generation, labelled with the range of sourced introduction years it contains. A band reads “—” when no caliber in it has a year anyone published — the gap is the finding, not a rendering failure. Dotted arcs above and below the drawing are related edges — successor, drop-in, no-derivation — which are stored in a different table from lineage and can never form part of an ancestry path.
Every edge in this view
| Caliber | Relationship | To | Status | Detail | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| design:omega-8500 | successor of related | Omega 2500 | accepted | succeeds the 2500 in the lineup; the source explicitly denies derivation | |
| design:roger-w-smith-series-2 | different from related | Omega 2500 | accepted | Both movements carry a Daniels co-axial escapement and they are not the same escapement: Smith's site says Omega used Daniels's slim-line version and only later moved to the original two-wheel-with-pinion form that the Series 2 was designed around. |
Sources
- 1teddybaldassarre.comhttps://teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/watches/co-axial-movementpresstier 3retrieved 2026-08-241 fact on this page
- 2swatchgroup.comhttps://www.swatchgroup.com/en/services/archive/2010/omegas-co-axial-storypresstier 3retrieved 2026-08-241 fact on this page
- 3rwsmithwatches.comhttps://rwsmithwatches.com/evolutionmanufacturertier 1retrieved 2026-08-241 fact on this page