CORPUS EXPORT · 12269 calibers · 59387 family views · round round/2026-09-08Compiled from app/public/data/ · corpus 70c0140eba.

Family line

Audemars Piguet 2385

Everything (debug)4 calibers3 lineage edges2 related edgesdesign:ap-2385compare specs · 4

This profile traverses clone_of · derived_from · design_imitation_of · ebauche_of · incorporates_module · licensed_copy_of · module_on · revision_of · tooling_transfer_of · variant_of and keeps disputed edges. Every edge in this view carries at least one reference.

100%drag to pan · ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom · hover a caliber to isolate its line
Edge types in this family
accepteddisputedcontested region

Generations run left to right, ancestors first, and the axis along the top is ordinal rather than linear: each band is one generation, labelled with the range of sourced introduction years it contains. A band reads “—” when no caliber in it has a year anyone published — the gap is the finding, not a rendering failure. Dotted arcs above and below the drawing are related edges — successor, drop-in, no-derivation — which are stored in a different table from lineage and can never form part of an ancestry path.

Every edge in this view

CaliberRelationshipToStatusDetailSources
Audemars Piguet 2385ébauche of
lineage
Frédéric Piguet 1185acceptedinterchange note: THE MISSING LEG OF THE FRÉDÉRIC PIGUET 1185 STORY, drawn 2026-08-24 during integration. The AP round authored this relationship as prose on the made_by claim because its target did not exist yet; the Omega/Zenith/Piguet round then declared design:frederic-piguet-1185, whose own file carries a sourced quote naming "the older AP Royal Oak Chronographs" as 1185 users. Both halves of the evidence were already in the corpus and only the edge was missing, so the 1185 fan-out read 1 of 4 named maisons instead of 3. WHY ebauche_of AND NOT derived_from: the source calls the 1185 an ébauche and states no modification, which is the same shape as ap-2120 / vacheron-constantin-1120 / patek-philippe-28-255-c against the JLC 920. Its sibling vacheron-constantin-1137 correctly carries derived_from instead, because THAT source does state a modification — a large-date mechanism added to the base. The edge type follows what each source says, not the house.
Vacheron Constantin 1137derived from
lineage
Frédéric Piguet 1185acceptedinterchange note: Large-date mechanism added to the FP 1185 base.
Cartier 205 (Frederic Piguet 1185)ébauche of
lineage
Frédéric Piguet 1185staged—
design:ap-4401successor of
related
Audemars Piguet 2385acceptedcatalogue replacement of a bought-in base by a self-developed one; the source frames the 4401 as clean-sheet, so this is a related_edge and NOT lineage
design:blancpain-f385successor of
related
Frédéric Piguet 1185acceptedcommercial replacement, NOT descent. The source contrasts the two rather than deriving one from the other: the 1185 is described as "getting a bit old compared to the competitors" and the F385 as in-house and exclusive.

Sources

  1. 1
    Monochrome Watches
    https://monochrome-watches.com/code-1159-by-audemars-piguet-selfwinding-chronograph-review-price/
    presstier 2retrieved 2026-08-242 facts on this page
  2. 2
    Monochrome Watches
    https://monochrome-watches.com/hands-on-with-the-blancpain-bathyscaphe-chronograph-flyback-live-photos-pricing/
    presstier 2retrieved 2026-08-242 facts on this page
  3. 3
    Monochrome Watches
    https://monochrome-watches.com/history-vacheron-constantin-overseas-1970s-icon/
    presstier 2retrieved 2026-08-241 fact on this page
  4. 4
    Internet Archive
    https://web.archive.org/web/20230906060713/http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Cartier_205&
    archivetier 2retrieved 2023-09-061 fact on this page